<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Things We Can Learn From Google Wave&#8217;s Demise</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lexiconn.com/blog/2010/08/google-wave-what-we-learned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lexiconn.com/blog/2010/08/google-wave-what-we-learned/</link>
	<description>All about e-Commerce, ShopSite, and Web Hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 19:59:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: WaveLook</title>
		<link>https://www.lexiconn.com/blog/2010/08/google-wave-what-we-learned/#comment-4189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[WaveLook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexiconn.com/blog/?p=2633#comment-4189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rob,
Wave is not dead, it&#039;s alive and well at http://wavelook.com

We&#039;ve just released our Wave client for Microsoft Outlook that has a unified inbox (emails and waves in the same inbox)

We are working on a Wave webapp that will let you sign into any wave server (sign up for beta waiting list at http://wavelook.com)

And we are working on a Wave server that will run in the cloud or you can deploy locally so that you can migrate your data from Google Wave (sign up for beta waiting list at http://wavelook.com)

So if you like Wave, you can still keep using it. It&#039;s not going anywhere.

wave or email us for details: info@wavelook.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,<br />
Wave is not dead, it&#8217;s alive and well at <a href="http://wavelook.com" rel="nofollow">http://wavelook.com</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve just released our Wave client for Microsoft Outlook that has a unified inbox (emails and waves in the same inbox)</p>
<p>We are working on a Wave webapp that will let you sign into any wave server (sign up for beta waiting list at <a href="http://wavelook.com" rel="nofollow">http://wavelook.com</a>)</p>
<p>And we are working on a Wave server that will run in the cloud or you can deploy locally so that you can migrate your data from Google Wave (sign up for beta waiting list at <a href="http://wavelook.com" rel="nofollow">http://wavelook.com</a>)</p>
<p>So if you like Wave, you can still keep using it. It&#8217;s not going anywhere.</p>
<p>wave or email us for details: <a href="mailto:info@wavelook.com">info@wavelook.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Mangiafico</title>
		<link>https://www.lexiconn.com/blog/2010/08/google-wave-what-we-learned/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Mangiafico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 18:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexiconn.com/blog/?p=2633#comment-4141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History does tend to repeat itself it seems...  ;)

Thanks for the comments.

Google is trying to get their hands into as many honey pots as they can, to find something that will stick. Although I believe they are probing the social media scene to protect their search dominance, as Facebook looks to be rolling out its own massive advertising system that could rival AdWords (and be more effective due to better targeting).

Time will tell...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History does tend to repeat itself it seems&#8230;  😉</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>Google is trying to get their hands into as many honey pots as they can, to find something that will stick. Although I believe they are probing the social media scene to protect their search dominance, as Facebook looks to be rolling out its own massive advertising system that could rival AdWords (and be more effective due to better targeting).</p>
<p>Time will tell&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve G</title>
		<link>https://www.lexiconn.com/blog/2010/08/google-wave-what-we-learned/#comment-4133</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 16:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexiconn.com/blog/?p=2633#comment-4133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tried it.. Used it.. Wasn&#039;t surprised at all when it went under.. Google has a long and glorious history of being unable to do social well.. Wave is done.. Buzz isn&#039;t too far behind.. The only real successes that Google has had outside of search is when they have outright copied other people, Google Docs, or when they have just spent the cash and bought their competitor, Youtube vs Google Video.. 

I&#039;ve been watching the rumors around Google.Me in relation to Facebook, plus their investments in social companies like Zynga and now Slide.. I see Google in the stage that Microsoft was in about 8 or 10 years ago.. Trying to get in to everything and failing at most of it simply because they have grown too big and don&#039;t have the passionate direction that they had with search, or in Microsoft&#039;s case, operating systems.. 

If history wins out the next big thing will be along in about 4 years and Google will slide backwards just as MS did and the new darling of the internet will take the stage and make the same mistakes..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried it.. Used it.. Wasn&#8217;t surprised at all when it went under.. Google has a long and glorious history of being unable to do social well.. Wave is done.. Buzz isn&#8217;t too far behind.. The only real successes that Google has had outside of search is when they have outright copied other people, Google Docs, or when they have just spent the cash and bought their competitor, Youtube vs Google Video.. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been watching the rumors around Google.Me in relation to Facebook, plus their investments in social companies like Zynga and now Slide.. I see Google in the stage that Microsoft was in about 8 or 10 years ago.. Trying to get in to everything and failing at most of it simply because they have grown too big and don&#8217;t have the passionate direction that they had with search, or in Microsoft&#8217;s case, operating systems.. </p>
<p>If history wins out the next big thing will be along in about 4 years and Google will slide backwards just as MS did and the new darling of the internet will take the stage and make the same mistakes..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention 5 Things We Can Learn From Google Wave’s Demise -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>https://www.lexiconn.com/blog/2010/08/google-wave-what-we-learned/#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tweets that mention 5 Things We Can Learn From Google Wave’s Demise -- Topsy.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 11:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lexiconn.com/blog/?p=2633#comment-4125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by LexiConn, Wave I/O News. Wave I/O News said: 5 Things We Can Learn From Google Wave&#039;s Demise: Recently Google announced that Google Wave would be discontinued ... http://bit.ly/aiVYk4 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This post was mentioned on Twitter by LexiConn, Wave I/O News. Wave I/O News said: 5 Things We Can Learn From Google Wave&#39;s Demise: Recently Google announced that Google Wave would be discontinued &#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/aiVYk4" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/aiVYk4</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
